Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
After market 07:59:58 pm | |||
168.3 USD | -1.11% | 168.9 | +0.37% |
12:04am | Business Lookahead: Fed straight ahead | RE |
Apr. 26 | Tech Advances After Strong Microsoft, Alphabet Earnings -- Tech Roundup | DJ |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
Weaknesses
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- With an expected P/E ratio at 74.65 and 50.91 respectively for both the current and next fiscal years, the company operates with high earnings multiples.
- The company's "enterprise value to sales" ratio is among the highest in the world.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-32.27% | 537B | C | ||
-33.10% | 26.57B | C- | ||
-50.50% | 9.29B | D+ | ||
-46.26% | 7.4B | B | ||
-68.94% | 6.08B | - | - | |
-41.57% | 5.68B | D+ | ||
0.00% | 3.92B | - | - | |
-30.11% | 4.26B | - | ||
-47.79% | 2.49B | - | ||
-4.82% | 2.27B | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- TSLA Stock
- Ratings Tesla, Inc.