AURELIA METALS LIMITED |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 0.205 AUD | 0.00% |
|
+7.89% | +86.36% |
| Apr. 24 | Jefferies Upgrades Aurelia Metals to Buy from Hold, Price Target is AU$0.23 | MT |
| Apr. 23 | Aurelia Metals Posts AU$106.9 Million Cash, AU$4.3 Million Operating Cash Flow for March Quarter | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.
- The company has a poor ESG score according to Refinitiv, which ranks companies by sector.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised upwards significantly.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Diversified Mining
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +86.36% | 231M | C- | ||
| -8.27% | 156B | C+ | ||
| -1.63% | 126B | C | ||
| +2.70% | 77.25B | C+ | ||
| +21.03% | 53.52B | B | ||
| +5.87% | 51B | B+ | ||
| +32.95% | 41.44B | C+ | ||
| +142.99% | 37.65B | A- | ||
| +30.10% | 27.72B | B- | ||
| +88.36% | 21.92B | C+ |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
-
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
Valuation
P/E ratio
-
EV / Sales
Price to Book
Price to Free Cash Flow
-
Yield
-
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Environment
Emissions
Innovation
Use of resources
Governance
CSR Strategy
Management
Shareholders
Controversy
Controversy
Technical analysis
ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes
- Stock Market
- Equities
- AMI Stock
- Ratings Aurelia Metals Limited