Business Management that Increases Sustainability
E | Responding to Environmental Issues |
Environmental |
Our Group is devoted to preserving the planet, the community, and ensuring a bright future for all.
For this reason, we actively pursue climate change measures and environmental conservation activities, and work continuously to reduce our environmental footprint.
Initiatives towards Climate Change Problems
We strive to grasp changes in social needs and risk factors and reflects these in business management from the ESG perspective in order to increase the effectiveness of efforts aimed at the sustainable creation of corporate value. As part of that, we expressed our support for the recommendations of the TCFD* in September 2019, and will enhance our climate change-related information disclosures to fulfill our responsibility to explain such matters to stakeholders.
- Abbreviation for the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. The Financial Stability Board (FSB), which is comprised of financial authorities from major countries, was established in December 2015 in response to a request provided by G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. In June 2017, the TCFD issued recommendations on the disclosure of information concerning climate-related risks and opportunities.
Governance
Addressing the problem of climate change constitutes an important management issue. The Sustainability Promotion Council, the Environmental Strategy Committee (chaired by the General Manager of the General Planning Division), and the Carbon Neutrality Promotion Committee (chaired by the President) are taking the lead in promoting measures taken against climate change.
Items positioned as particularly important within the deliberation process of each committee are submitted to higher-ranking committees for discussion (including the Board of Directors). The results of those discussions are reflected upon the management plans for each fiscal year to improve and enhance the initiatives being undertaken.
Governance and promotion framework for measures against climate change
Shikoku Electric Power | Shikoku Electric | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Transmission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher-ranking committees such as the Board of Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
& Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Items positioned as particularly important | Co., Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Neutrality Promotion Committee | Sustainability Promotion Council | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Operated by the Company and Shikoku Electric Power Transmission & | Distribution Co., Inc.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deliberation / Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deliberation / Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coordination | Important issues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental | Environment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deliberation / Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indicators / targets and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matters related to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
information disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
policies on initiatives | ReportIntegratedGroupPowerElectricShikoku BookDataRelated-EnvironmentalGroupYondenand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
related to measures taken | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aimed at carbon neutrality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
against climate change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
disclosureinformationofEnhancement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Companywide plan drafting (P) [Reection of risk management] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department | Inspection (C) / Revision (A) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Companywide plan dissemination | Concentration of activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Divisions, | Formulation of | Inspection (C) / Revision (A) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branch Ofces, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Stations, | detailed plans (P) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
etc. | Implementation (D) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal | Internal audit (C) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Division | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental | Deliberations that are focused on setting targets for measures against climate change, on assessing | ||
Strategy Committee | and managing the status of the achievement of said targets, and on enhancing information disclosure | ||
Carbon Neutrality | Deliberations that are focused on policies concerning various initiatives (in terms of supply and | ||
Promotion Committee | demand) with the aim of achieving carbon neutrality in 2050 | See pages 15-16 | |
Shikoku Electric Power Group INTEGRATED REPORT 2022 46
Business Management that Increases Sustainability
Responding to Environmental Issues
Risk management
We understand strongly the importance of climate change-related risk management. Every year, the management team conducts checks and reviews after extracting climate change-related risks that have the potential to significantly impact management, taking into comprehensive account factors such as the probability of occurrence, and their impact on earnings and expenses (Cost increases, etc.). We strive to prevent the occurrence of risks and reduce their impact on the operation of our business by incorporating the results into our business plans for the following fiscal year. See page 63
* Our climate change-related risk management system is integrated into our company-wide risk management system
Strategy
We will continuously evaluate and confirm what kinds of impacts climate change-related risks and opportunities will have on our company's business operations under certain future scenarios, formulate the required measures based on the results, and then transit to the execution of those measures.
Scenario selection
We selected a scenario in which measures at the current level could continue to be taken (Scenario involving less than 4°C*1), a scenario involving the taking of measures which are stricter in comparison with the current level (2°C scenario*2), and a scenario involving the taking of
Change in global average temperature from 1850 to 1900
(°C)
5
SSP5-8.5
4 | SSP3-7.0 |
measures which are even stricter than those involved in the 2°C scenario (1.5°C scenario*3). We then assumed the future image of the electric power business under each scenario.
*1 See the Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS) presented by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and SSP2-4.5 of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
*2 See the Announced Pledges Scenario (APS) presented by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and SSP1-2.6 of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
3
2
1
0
-1
SSP2-4.5
SSP1-2.6
SSP1-1.9
*3 See The Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE) presented by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and SSP1-1.9 of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
1950 | 2000 2015 | 2050 | 2100 (year) |
Source: IPCC AR6 WG I
Future image of the electric power business
Item | 1.5°C scenario, 2°C scenario | Scenario involving less than 4°C | |
• Rapid change in policies aimed at decarbonization | • Gradual change of policies aimed at decarbonization (Thermal | ||
power is maintained while introducing renewable energy as an | |||
Energy policy | (promotion of the development of renewable energy, nuclear | ||
extension of current policy in consideration of stable supply and | |||
energy and hydrogen energy) | |||
Policies | economic factors) | ||
Other policies | • Introduction of carbon taxes and emission trading schemes | • Introduction of carbon taxes and emission trading schemes | |
advances rapidly | advances gradually | ||
Technology | Low carbonization and | • Technological innovation in low carbonized and | • Technological innovation in low carbonized and decarbonized |
decarbonization technologies | decarbonized power generation progresses rapidly | power generation progresses gently | |
Fuel price | Fossil fuels | • Fossil fuel use declines and fuel prices fall | • Fossil fuel use gradually declines and fuel prices gradually fall |
Energy demand | • Increasing electrification undertaken in an effort to | • The lack of societal momentum toward decarbonization and the | |
lack of progress in terms of electrification will reduce demand for | |||
decarbonize will serve to increase demand for electricity | |||
Market | electricity | ||
Customer needs | • Needs for low carbonized/decarbonized power significantly | • The need for low carbonized/decarbonized electricity will increase | |
increase | to a certain extent | ||
Disasters | Unusual weather | • Typhoons and other disasters occur, but the extent of the | • Typhoons and other disasters will become more intense, causing |
damage caused is not much different than the current situation | more damage than seen currently | ||
47 Shikoku Electric Power Group INTEGRATED REPORT 2022
Shikoku Electric Power Group | President's Message | Value Creation through | Business Management that | Financial / Corporate Information | ||||
Value Creation | Business Activities | Increases Sustainability | ||||||
Risks and opportunities
Climate change-related risks and opportunities were identified for the 1.5°C scenario, the 2°C scenario, and the scenario involving less than 4°C. We conducted an evaluation and confirmation of the major factors which will affect our company's business in the future. As a result, we were able to confirm that while there is a possibility of increased costs due mainly to the "expansion of the ratio of non-fossil power sources / strengthening of regulations on thermal power sources" and the "introduction of a carbon pricing" when it comes to the 2°C scenario and a scenario involving less than 4°C, on the other hand, we can also expect improvements in profitability due to "improvements in the value of non-fossil power sources" and the "development of electrification / expansion of needs for low carbonized /decarbonized electricity." The trends seen in terms of these effects may be more pronounced in the 1.5 °C scenario.
We also considered measures serving to minimize risks and maximize opportunities. Each of these measures has been reflected upon the Group's Medium-Term Management Plan. We will contribute to the realization of a sustainable society through the steady implementation of these measures.
Key risks, opportunities and responses as extracted from each scenario
Transition risks
Physical risks
Opportunities
Classication | Impact period* | Details of risks and opportunities | Main measures | |
Expansion of the ratio | Short/ | • Cost increases due to the expansion of the ratio of | ||
of non-fossil power sources / | Medium/ | non-fossil power sources and the strengthening of | ||
strengthening of regulations | • R&D and introduction of new technologies such as | |||
Long | regulations on thermal power sources | |||
on thermal power sources | ||||
Policies and | hydrogen and ammonia power generation | |||
•Further expansion of the introduction of renewable | ||||
regulations | Short/ | • Increase in costs resulting from the introduction of | ||
Introduction of carbon pricing | energy power sources | |||
Medium/ | ||||
carbon pricing | ||||
Long | ||||
Market | Short/ | • Reduction in electricity sales due to the lack of electrification | • Promotion of electrification | |
Decline in electricity sales | Medium/ | • Reduction in sales of electricity due to reduced | • Promotion of low carbonization and | |
Long | acceptance of thermal power sources | decarbonization of power sources | ||
Reputation | Short/ | • Decline in investors' appetite for investment and | • Appropriate disclosure of information to | |
Lack of information disclosure | Medium/ | withdrawal of investments (Divestment) due to | ||
stakeholders | ||||
Long | declining reputation | |||
Short/ | • Insufficient supply and adjustment capabilities resulting | • Securing supply and adjustment capabilities | ||
Chronic | Increased chronicity of | from increases in peak demand arising due to rising | ||
Medium/ | ||||
abnormal weather | and falling of temperatures and due to increases in | through the further utilization of electric energy | ||
Long | ||||
renewable energy | ||||
Intensification of | Short/ | • Increases in the cost of recovery from typhoons and | • Strengthening of disaster response systems including | |
Acute | Medium/ | the strengthening of cooperation with local | ||
natural disasters | other natural disasters | |||
Long | governments, related organizations, etc. (Reference (1)) | |||
Short/ | • Improvements in the superiority of nuclear power stations | • Continuation of the safe and stable operation of | ||
Improvements in the value of | nuclear power stations (Reference (2)) | |||
Medium/ | • Increases in profits due to the expanded introduction of | |||
non-fossil power sources | • Further expansion of the introduction of renewable | |||
Long | renewable energy | |||
Energy | energy power sources | |||
sources | R&D progress for | • Commercialization of hydrogen power generation | ||
Long | • Promotion of decarbonization of power sources | |||
new technologies | through progress in research and development | |||
Development of | Short/ | • Increases in sales of electricity due to increased | • Further expansion of the introduction of low | |
Products/ | electrification and expansion of | electrification needs | carbonized and decarbonized power sources, | |
Medium/ | ||||
services | needs for low carbonized/ | • Increases in electricity sales volumes due to increases | promotion of electrification, and other such elements | |
Long | ||||
decarbonized electricity | in low carbonized/decarbonized electricity needs | • Provision of CO2-free rate menus, etc. | ||
Increasing need to | Short/ | • Rising market prices due to a lack of supply and | • Securing of supply and adjustment capabilities | |
secure supply and | Medium/ | |||
adjustment capabilities nationwide | based on the optimization of supply facilities | |||
adjustment capabilities | Long | |||
Resilience | ||||
Increasing need for | Short/ | • Improvement of corporate evaluations relating to | • Strengthening of disaster response systems | |
disaster prevention and | Medium/ | including the strengthening of cooperation with | ||
disaster responses | ||||
mitigation | Long | local governments, related organizations, etc. | ||
* Short/medium term: Up to 2030; Long term: Up to 2050
Major impact assessment for fiscal 2030 in terms of the 2°C scenario and a scenario involving less than 4°C
Expansion of the ratio of | Risks | Opportunities | |||||||||
Improvements in | |||||||||||
non-fossil power sources / | Introduction of | Decline in | |||||||||
the value of non-fossil | |||||||||||
strengthening of regulations | |||||||||||
electricity sales | |||||||||||
carbon pricing | power sources | ||||||||||
on thermal power sources | |||||||||||
2°C | Less than | Less than | Less than | ||||||||
4°C | 2°C | 4°C | 2°C | 4°C | |||||||
2°C Less than | 2°C Less than | ||||||||||
4°C | 4°C |
Development of electrication and expansion of needs for low carbonized/ decarbonized electricity
Major financial impact (Reference)
- Responses to increasingly severe natural disasters
Costs for recovery from the July in 2018 Japan floods
Approx. 3 billion yen
- Safe and stable operation of nuclear power
Improved balance of payments after one month of
safe and stable operation of Ikata Unit No.3*
Approx. 4 billion yen
* Effects in terms of improvement of the balance of payments related to supply and demand estimated based on fiscal 2021 results
Shikoku Electric Power Group INTEGRATED REPORT 2022 48
Business Management that Increases Sustainability
Responding to Environmental Issues
Transition plan: Carbon Neutral Challenge 2050
The Group has set up a challenge of becoming carbon neutral in 2050 as a long-term priority within its Medium-Term Management Plan. With that being the case, we have formulated a roadmap and are promoting specific initiatives concerning the "low carbonization
and decarbonization of power sources," and the "further utilization of electric energy" with a view to fiscal 2030 and even further ahead to fiscal 2050 based on the measures serving to address climate change-related risks and opportunities which have been reflected within our Medium-Term Management Plan.
Indicators and targets
We have set targets for various climate-related indicators, such as CO2 emissions and ratios for non-fossil power sources. We will work to minimize climate change-related risks and maximize opportunities by promoting initiatives that are aimed at achieving these targets.
Halve CO2 emissions produced by the Company's retail sector by fiscal 2030
(in comparison to fiscal 2013)
Our Group is promoting the "low carbonization and decarbonization of power sources" by maximizing the use of nuclear power and renewable energy, improving the efficiency of thermal power generation, and expanding upon the introduction of renewable energy, as well as the "further use of electric energy" based on initiatives such as the promotion of electrification including the industrial and transportation sectors. By doing so, we aim to reduce our CO2 emissions in the retail sector by half in fiscal 2030 compared to fiscal 2013.
* CO2 emissions for the most recent fiscal year | See page 73 | |
CO2 emissions related to retail sector
(10,000 tons-CO2)
2,000
1,962*1 | Reduction | ||||||
1,500 | target | ||||||
-50% | |||||||
1,000 | 1,315*1 | ||||||
(1,189*2 | ) | ||||||
500 | Approx. 980 | ||||||
0 | |||||||
2013 | 2021 | Target for 2030 | (FY) |
*1 Emissions excluding free allocation of FIT on the same basis as the fiscal 2030 target *2 Emissions including free allocation of FIT (Value based on the Act on Promotion of
Global Warming Countermeasures)
Greenhouse gas emissions in the supply chain (Scopes 1, 2, and 3)*1 and a breakdown of Scope 3
Calculated referred to documents such as the "Basic Guidelines for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions through the Supply Chain (ver. 2.4)" (Ministry of the Environment / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)
Item*2 | Emissions volume |
(10,000 tons-CO2) | |
Purchased materials and equipment | 0.8 |
Scope 3
721.3 | |
Fiscal 2021 | |
(10,000 tons-CO2) | |
Scope 2 | Scope 1 |
0.0 | |
966.0 | |
Scope 1:
Emissions associated with fuel use for our own power generation and so on. [Including CO2, SF6, N2O and HFCs]
Scope 2:
Emissions associated with the use of electricity purchased from other companies at our places of business (ofces)
Scope 3:
Emissions contained in electricity purchased from other companies for sale, etc.
Capital goods | 40.4 |
Fuel and energy-related activities | 664.8 |
Transportation, delivery (upstream) | 0.0 |
Waste produced by business | 2.8 |
Business trips | 0.1 |
Employee commuting | 0.1 |
Investments | 12.4 |
*1 This does not correspond with CO2 emissions in retail sales, including CO2 emissions in wholesale sales, etc.
*2 There are no emissions with respect to lease assets (upstream or downstream), transportation and distribution (downstream), sold products (used, processed, disposed) or franchises.
49 Shikoku Electric Power Group INTEGRATED REPORT 2022
Shikoku Electric Power Group | President's Message | Value Creation through | Business Management that | Financial / Corporate Information | ||||
Value Creation | Business Activities | Increases Sustainability | ||||||
Ratio of non-fossil certificates held by the retail sector of the Company in relation to the amount of electricity sold*1 Achievement of 44% or more*2 in fiscal 2030
In order to respond to opportunities such as the increasing need for low carbonized and decarbonized electricity, we will aim to increase the ratio of non-fossil certificates held by the retail sector in relation to the amount of electricity sold (Equivalent to the ratio of non-fossil power sources derived from the Act on Sophisticated Methods of Energy Supply Structures*1) to 44% or more*2 in fiscal 2030.
We will also proactively work on continuing the safe and stable operation of nuclear power plants, which are non-fossil power sources, increase the output of hydroelectric power plants, and other such efforts.
Ratio of non-fossil certificates held by the retail sector
of the Company in relation to the amount of electricity sold
Zero power plants that are inadequately prepared for conceivable flood risks
We have conducted risk assessments of power plants in relation to conceivable floods based on past disasters and other factors. As a result of these assessments, we have completed the construction works for countermeasures at power plants requiring countermeasures.
We will continue to make efforts to prepare for risks, including responding to disasters which had not been previously anticipated in the past. This is something that we will do by implementing measures in terms of equipment and providing responses with respect to elements of an intangible nature such as disaster drills.
Achievement of the fiscal 2030 benchmark indicators (Act on the Rational Use of Energy)*1
Fiscal 2021
No fossil value
70%
Non-fossil certificates (With renewable energy designation)
15%
Non-fossil certificates (Without renewable energy designation)
3%
Allocation of surplus non-fossil value (Including FIT free-of-charge distribution)
12%
(Indicator A: 1.00 or higher, Indicator B: 44.3% or higher)*2
The thermal efficiency of thermal power plants declines gradually, caused by operating time and the deterioration of facilities. We implement daily equipment inspections, operational management and equipment upgrades appropriately to make efforts to maintain the thermal efficiency of existing thermal power plants. We are also working on improving the efficiency of thermal power generation through the promotion of the replacement of aging thermal power facilities (See page 31).
*1 In order to promote the effective use of non-fossil power sources such as renewable energy and nuclear power, the Act on Sophisticated Methods of Energy Supply Structures (Act on the Promotion of Use of Non-Fossil Energy Sources and the Effective Use of Fossil Energy Materials by Energy Suppliers) sets a target for the ratio of non-fossil power sources for retail electric power business operators, etc., who supply electricity
Actual non-fossil power ratio in the most recent fiscal year
*2 Notification No. 79 of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of 2020 "Judgment Standard for Electricity Utilities Concerning the Use of Non-Fossil Energy Sources" requires that, in fiscal 2030, 44% or more of the electricity supplied by retail electric power business operators be derived from non-fossil power sources.
Investments aimed at low carbonization and decarbonization of power sources Cumulative total of 350 billion yen for the 10-year period spanning from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2030
In order to respond to climate change-related risks and opportunities, we will invest a cumulative 350 billion yen over the 10-year period spanning from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2030 to promote low carbon and decarbonization of power sources.
FY2021 performance | |
Amount of investments related to low | Approx. 70 billion yen |
carbonization and decarbonization of power sources |
Through these efforts, we aim to achieve the benchmark indicator targets of the Act on the Rational Use of Energy in fiscal 2030.
FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | |
Indicator A | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.02 |
Indicator B (%) | 43.1 | 43.1 | 42.1 |
*1 Under the Act on the Rational Use of Energy, an index (benchmark index) is set for a specific industry and field so that the state of energy saving of business operators in that industry can be compared.
Indicator A: Indicator of the rate of accomplishment of target for power generation efficiency by fuel source
Indicator B: Indicator of overall thermal power generation efficiency
*2 Notification No. 69 of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of 2021 "Judgment Standards for Business Operators Concerning Rationalization of the Use of Energy in Factories, etc." stipulates that the target level in fiscal 2030 for Indicator A is 1.0 or more and for Indicator B is 44.3% or more.
Developing new renewable energy throughout the Group
500 MW by fiscal 2030
2,000 MW by fiscal 2050
* Results up to the end of fiscal 2021 | See page 29 | |
Shikoku Electric Power Group INTEGRATED REPORT 2022 50
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Shikoku Electric Power Company Inc. published this content on 27 September 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 03 October 2022 16:11:47 UTC.