Summary

● On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.

● From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation

● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a relative ranking of the company within its sector, comes out particularly poor.


Strengths

● The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.


Weaknesses

● As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.

● The company does not generate enough profits, which is an alarming weak point.

● The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 339.64 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.

● For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.

● The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.

● For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.

● For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.

● Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.

● The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.