Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;

Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain


          Officers.


2021 Annual Equity Awards

On December 31, 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Concho Board (the "Compensation Committee") approved the grant of performance units (the "2021 Performance Units") and restricted stock (the "2021 Restricted Stock Awards") to officers on January 4, 2021 of the Concho under Concho's 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by Concho stockholders in May 2019. The number of awards granted was based on the mean of the high and low sales price of Concho common stock on December 31, 2020. These awards were previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement under the heading "The Merger Proposal - Interests of Concho Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger - 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards".

2021 Performance Unit Awards

The 2021 Performance Units granted to each recipient are payable in shares of Concho common stock based upon the achievement by Concho over a performance period commencing on January 1, 2021 and ending on December 31, 2023 of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The number of shares of Concho common stock that may be issued pursuant to an award will be determined by multiplying the number of 2021 Performance Units granted under the award by the result of multiplying the "Relative TSR Percentage" by the "Absolute TSR Percentage." The "Relative TSR Percentage" is the percentage, if any, achieved by attainment of the following performance goals for the performance period, as certified by the Compensation Committee: (i) if Concho's total shareholder return ("TSR") measured against Concho's peer group is below the 25th percentile, the Relative TSR Percentage is 0%; (ii) if the TSR measured against Concho's peer group is at the 25th percentile, the Relative TSR Percentage is 50%; (iii) if the TSR measured against Concho's peer group is at the 50th percentile, the Relative TSR Percentage is 100%; (iv) if the TSR measured against Concho's peer group is at the 70th percentile, the Relative TSR Percentage is 150%; and (v) if the TSR measured against Concho's peer group is in the 90th percentile or above, the Relative TSR Percentage is 200%, with 200% being the maximum and the Compensation Committee applying straight line interpolation for all points between such performance levels. The "Absolute TSR Percentage" is the percentage achieved by attainment of the following performance goals for the performance period, as certified by the Compensation Committee: (a) if Concho's absolute annualized TSR is less than 0%, the Absolute TSR Percentage is 75%; (b) if Concho's absolute annualized TSR is at least 0% and not greater than 5%, the Absolute TSR Percentage is 87.5%; (c) if Concho's absolute annualized TSR is at least 5% and not greater than 10%, the Absolute TSR Percentage is 100%; (d) if Concho's absolute annualized TSR is at least 10% and not greater than 15%, the Absolute TSR Percentage is 112.5%; and (e) if Concho's absolute annualized TSR is greater than 15%, the Absolute TSR Percentage is 125%. TSR for Concho and each of the peer companies is generally determined by dividing (A) the average closing stock prices on each trading day during the period beginning on the first day of the calendar month in which the last day of the performance period occurs and ending on the last day of the performance period plus cash dividends paid over the performance period minus the starting average stock price by (B) the starting average stock price, with the starting average stock price being the average of the closing stock prices on each trading day in the calendar month immediately preceding the first day of the performance period.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dividend equivalents with respect to any cash dividends paid during the performance period are paid at the same time, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as are applicable to 2021 Performance Units, except that if more than one share of Concho common stock becomes payable in respect of a 2021 Performance Unit, then the maximum amount of dividend equivalents payable with respect to such unit equals the aggregate amount of cash dividends paid during the performance period on one share of Concho common stock.

Upon the closing of the Merger, the 2021 Performance Units will be automatically converted into a number of ConocoPhillips restricted stock based on the Exchange Ratio and assuming achievement of the applicable performance goals at target performance (100%). As converted, each ConocoPhillips restricted stock award corresponding to a 2021 Performance Unit will (i) vest one-third per year on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, (ii) immediately vest in full upon a Qualifying Termination (as defined in the 2021 Performance Unit Award Agreement) and (iii) otherwise be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the corresponding 2021 Performance Unit immediately prior to the Effective Time; provided, that as of the Effective Time, the performance-vesting conditions shall no longer apply. In addition, in consideration for the 2021 Performance Units and certain other awards, the 2021 Performance Units granted to each of Messrs. Leach, Harper and Giraud contain certain non-competition restrictions that will apply in the event such officer is terminated prior to the second anniversary of the closing of the Merger and eligible to receive severance in connection with such termination and "good reason" will be defined per their ConocoPhillips employment letter.

The number of 2021 Performance Units granted on January 4, 2021 by the Compensation Committee to the Company's named executive officers is as follows: Mr. Leach, 103,014 Performance Units; Mr. Harper, 42,236 Performance Units; Mr. Giraud, 31,763 Performance Units; Mr. Counts, 18,886 Performance Units and Ms. Schroer, 18,886 Performance Units.

The foregoing description of the 2021 Performance Units granted to Concho's named executive officers is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the form of 2021 Performance Unit Award Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1, and incorporated herein by reference.

2021 Restricted Stock Awards

The 2021 Restricted Stock Awards granted to each officer vest in four equal annual installments beginning on January 4, 2022. Upon the closing of the Merger, the 2021 Restricted Stock Awards will be automatically converted into a number of ConocoPhillips restricted stock based on the Exchange Ratio. As converted, each ConocoPhillips restricted stock award corresponding to a 2021 Restricted Stock Award will (i) vest one-third per year on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, (ii) immediately vest in full upon a Qualifying Termination (as defined in the 2021 Restricted Stock Award Agreement) and (iii) otherwise be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the corresponding 2021 Restricted Stock Award immediately prior to the Effective Time.

The number of 2021 Restricted Stock Awards granted on January 4, 2021 by the Compensation Committee to the Company's named executive officers is as follows: Mr. Leach, 51,507 Restricted Stock Awards; Mr. Harper, 28,157 Restricted Stock Awards; Mr. Giraud, 31,763 Restricted Stock Awards; Mr. Counts, 18,886 Restricted Stock Awards and Ms. Schroer, 18,886 Restricted Stock Awards.

The foregoing description of the 2021 Restricted Stock Award granted to Concho's named executive officers is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the form of 2021 Restricted Stock Award Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2, and incorporated herein by reference.

Amendment of Succession Restricted Stock Awards

On January 2, 2019, each of Messrs. Harper and Giraud were granted certain awards of restricted stock that vest over a period of ten years at a rate of 20% per year commencing on the sixth anniversary of the grant date (the "Succession Restricted Stock Awards"). On December 31, 2020, the Compensation Committee amended the Succession Restricted Stock Awards, contingent on the closing of the Merger, so that each such award shall vest in three equal installments on each of January 2, 2022, 2023 and 2024, subject to such other terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement (including immediate vesting acceleration upon a Qualifying Termination (as defined therein)). Except for the aforementioned change to the vesting schedule, the Succession Restricted Stock Awards will continue to remain governed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement. This action was previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement under the heading "The Merger Proposal - Interests of Concho Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger - Other Compensation Matters".

The foregoing description of the Succession Restricted Stock Awards is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of a Succession Restricted Stock Agreement which contains the terms of the award. The Succession Restricted Stock Awards granted to each of Messrs. Harper and Giraud are evidenced by a form Succession Restricted Stock Award previously approved by the Compensation Committee that was filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Concho's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 4, 2019 and is incorporated herein by reference.

2018 Performance Unit Awards

On December 28, 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance units previously granted to certain officers of Concho with respect to a . . .




Item 8.01 Other Events.

Litigation Related to the Merger

In connection with the Merger, seven lawsuits were filed between November 23 and December 28, 2020 against one or more of Concho, the directors of Concho, ConocoPhillips, the directors of ConocoPhillips and Merger Sub (collectively, the "Defendants"). Four complaints, Stein v. Concho Resources Inc. et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-01582-UNA, Chappidi v. Concho Resources Inc. et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-01584-UNA, Lovoi v. ConocoPhillips et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-01638-UNA and Davydov v. ConocoPhillips et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-01674-UNA (the "Davydov lawsuit"), were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. One complaint, Ortiz v. Concho Resources Inc. et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-05886, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. One complaint, Stracener v. ConocoPhillips et al., C.A. No. 1:20-cv-10954, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. One complaint, Garfield v. Bunch et al., No. 2020-79700, was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas (the "Garfield lawsuit").

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The complaints filed in federal court generally allege, among other things, that the Defendants disseminated a false or misleading registration statement regarding the proposed Merger in violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and SEC Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. These complaints allege that the preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus or the Definitive Proxy Statement filed by ConocoPhillips misstated or omitted material information regarding the parties' financial projections, the analyses performed by Concho's and ConocoPhillips' respective financial advisors, potential conflicts of interest involving Concho's and ConocoPhillips' respective financial advisors and/or the sales process leading up to the Merger, and that disclosure of material information is necessary for Concho's and ConocoPhillips' stockholders to make informed decisions regarding whether to vote in favor of the Merger or the issuance of shares of ConocoPhillips common stock in connection with the Merger (the "Share Issuance"). Other than the Davydov lawsuit, the complaints further allege that Concho's or ConocoPhillips' directors and/or ConocoPhillips are liable for alleged violations as "controlling persons" of Concho and ConocoPhillips under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Garfield lawsuit alleges, among other things, that ConocoPhillips and the directors of ConocoPhillips disseminated a Definitive Proxy Statement that contains materially false and misleading statements and omissions in violation of Texas common law. The complaint alleges that the Definitive Proxy Statement included false or misleading statements regarding conflicts of interests of those promoting the Merger, as well as financial information underlying the analyses conducted by ConocoPhillips' financial advisor in formulating its fairness opinion, and that disclosure of material information is necessary for ConocoPhillips' stockholders to make informed decisions regarding whether to vote in favor of the Share Issuance. Among other relief, the complaints seek injunctive relief, including enjoining the Merger unless and until the Defendants disclose the allegedly omitted material information, rescinding the Merger in the event the Defendants consummate the Merger (or awarding rescissory damages), damages, and an award of attorneys' and experts' fees. ConocoPhillips and Concho believe that the claims in the complaints are without merit and that no further disclosure is required under applicable law.

As a result of supplemental disclosures set forth herein, the plaintiff in the Garfield lawsuit has entered into an agreement to voluntarily dismiss his action with prejudice.

Supplemental Disclosures to Definitive Proxy Statement

This supplemental information to the Definitive Proxy Statement should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality of any of the disclosures set forth herein. All page references in the information below are to pages in the Definitive Proxy Statement, and all terms used but not defined below shall have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement.

The following underlined language is added to the second full paragraph in the section of the Definitive Proxy Statement entitled "The Merger-Opinion of Goldman Sachs, ConocoPhillips' Financial Advisor-Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow Analysis-Concho Standalone" that appears on pages 94-95.

Using discount rates ranging from 5.5% to 7.5%, reflecting estimates of Concho's weighted average cost of capital, Goldman Sachs discounted to present value as of June 30, 2020 (i) estimates of the unlevered free cash flows to be generated by Concho on a standalone basis for the period from June 30, 2020 to December 31, 2025, as reflected in the forecasts for Concho, and (ii) a range of illustrative terminal values for Concho as of December 31, 2025, calculated by applying perpetuity growth rates ranging from (0.5)% to 0.5% to the estimate of the terminal year unlevered free cash flow of Concho, as reflected in the forecasts for Concho (which analysis implied multiples of the implied terminal values derived for Concho to estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization expense (which we refer to as "EBITDA") for Concho, as reflected in the forecasts for Concho, for 2025, ranging from 3.9x to 6.3x). Goldman Sachs derived the discount rates referenced above by application of the capital asset pricing model (which we refer to as "CAPM"), which requires certain company-specific inputs, including the company's target capital structure weightings, the cost of long-term debt, future applicable marginal cash tax rate and a beta for the company, as well as certain financial metrics for the United States financial markets generally. The range of perpetuity growth rates was estimated by Goldman Sachs utilizing its professional judgment and experience, taking into account the forecasts for Concho on a standalone basis and market expectations regarding long-term real growth of gross domestic product and inflation. Goldman Sachs derived a range of illustrative enterprise values for Concho by adding the ranges of present values it derived as described above. Goldman Sachs then subtracted from the range of illustrative enterprise values it derived the net debt of Concho as of June 30, 2020, as reflected in Concho's consolidated balance sheet as of that date, adjusted by approximately $100 million to reflect Concho's public offering of its 2.400% Senior Notes in August 2020 and redemption of its 4.375% Senior Notes in September 2020, to derive a range of illustrative equity values for Concho. Goldman Sachs then divided the range of illustrative equity values it derived for Concho on a standalone basis by the fully diluted shares of Concho common stock outstanding as of October 16, 2020, calculated based on equity information provided by Concho management and approved for standalone basis, for 2025, ranging from 4.3x to 7.3x). Goldman Sachs derived the discount rates referenced above by application of CAPM. The range of perpetuity growth rates was estimated by Goldman Sachs utilizing its professional judgment and experience, taking into account the forecasts for ConocoPhillips on a standalone basis and market expectations regarding long-term real growth of gross domestic product and inflation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following underlined language is added to the first full paragraph in the section of the Definitive Proxy Statement entitled "The Merger-Opinion of Credit Suisse, Concho's Financial Advisor-Selected Company Analysis" that appears on pages 107-108.

Credit Suisse considered certain financial data for Concho, ConocoPhillips and selected companies with publicly traded equity securities Credit Suisse deemed relevant. The selected companies were selected because they were deemed to be similar to Concho and ConocoPhillips in one or more respects. For purposes of these analyses, (1) Credit Suisse was directed by Concho to use the Concho projections (Case A) and the Concho projections for ConocoPhillips (Case A) given that the scenarios contemplated by Case A were considered by Concho management to most closely resemble then current market conditions and near-term production growth profiles, (2) except as otherwise noted, share prices for the selected companies were closing prices as of October 16, 2020 and (3) estimates of future financial performance for the selected companies for the years ending December 31, 2021 and 2022 used to select the implied multiple ranges were based on publicly available research analyst estimates for those companies.

The following underlined language is added to the first two full paragraphs in the section of the Definitive Proxy Statement entitled "The Merger-Opinion of Credit Suisse, Concho's Financial Advisor-Discounted Cash Flow Analysis" that appear on pages 109-110.

Concho. Credit Suisse performed a discounted cash flow analysis with respect to Concho by calculating the estimated net present value of the projected after-tax, unlevered, free cash flows of Concho based on each of the four cases described above comprising the Concho projections. Credit Suisse applied, based on its professional judgment and experience, terminal multiples of 5.0x-6.0x to Concho's estimated EBITDAX for the year ended December 31, 2030 based on each . . .

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.






Exhibit
  No.        Description

10.1           Form of 2021 Performance Unit Award Agreement

10.2           Form of 2021 Restricted Stock Award Agreement

10.3           Form of Supplemental Retention Award Agreement

104          Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses