Fitch Ratings has downgraded
All ratings remain on Rating Watch Negative. A full list of rating actions is below.
RATING RATIONALE
The downgrade reflects corporate governance concerns evident from prolonged failure of management to manage regulatory financial disclosures past statutory timeline. In addition, the Rating Watch Negative reflects the continued lack of clarity in relation to the impact of
APGL, the holding company of both Azure RG2 and Azure RG3, missed its statutory deadline in filing its Form 20-F audited financial statements for its financial year ended
That said, the ringfenced structure of the restricted groups, covenants and standard cash distribution waterfall provide some safeguard to bondholders from the implications stemming from a series of event at the APGL level. Both restricted groups have released their FY22 unaudited financial statements, while audited financial statements could only be released upon filing with the US SEC.
Azure RG2's rating headroom has also reduced significantly in light of continuing under-performance of the portfolio. The portfolio level generation remains about 6% lower than the P90 level. Continuing operational under-performance and/or material difference in audited financial statements will warrant higher stress in our rating case and may affect the credit assessment further. On the other hand, Azure RG3's operational and financial performance according to the unaudited numbers remain in line with our expectations.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
For an overview of the underlying credit profiles of Azure RG 1and Azure RG2, see the rating action commentaries published on
ESG - Management Strategy: Management has failed to anticipate and manage regulatory financial disclosures on time. APGL cited 'ongoing review of its internal control and compliance framework' as the cause of the delay in filing its annual report with the US SEC. There has also been key management turnover at the group level.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
Azure RG3
Continued material weakness in corporate governance;
Average annual debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR) during the refinance period dropping below 1.40x persistently.
Azure RG2
Continued material weakness in corporate governance;
Average annual DSCR during the refinance period dropping below 1.35x persistently.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
The Rating Watch Negative will be removed if there are no material implications from management's operational and financial disclosures at the Azure RG2 and RG3 level. The ratings could be upgraded following our assessment of identified concerns in the disclosures.
Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario
International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from '
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg
(C) 2023 Electronic News Publishing, source