Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.


Strengths

● According to sales estimates from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's, the company is among the best with regard to growth.

● The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● For the last few months, EPS revisions have remained quite promising. Analysts now anticipate higher profitability levels than before.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.

● The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.

● Predictions on business development from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's are tight. This results from either a good visibility into core activities or accurate earnings releases.


Weaknesses

● With an expected P/E ratio at 59.23 and 39.84 respectively for both the current and next fiscal years, the company operates with high earnings multiples.

● The company's "enterprise value to sales" ratio is among the highest in the world.

● In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.

● The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.