Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company presents an interesting fundamental situation from a short-term investment perspective.

● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.


Strengths

● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.

● Margins returned by the company are among the highest on the stock exchange list. Its core activity clears big profits.

● The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.

● Over the last twelve months, the sales forecast has been frequently revised upwards.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.

● For the last few months, EPS revisions have remained quite promising. Analysts now anticipate higher profitability levels than before.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.

● Predictions on business development from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's are tight. This results from either a good visibility into core activities or accurate earnings releases.

● The group usually releases upbeat results with huge surprise rates.


Weaknesses

● The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.

● The company benefits from high valuations in earnings multiples.

● The company's "enterprise value to sales" ratio is among the highest in the world.

● In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.

● The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.