Billion-Dollar Bribery Scandal Sweeps Through Oil Industry -- WSJ

Envoyer par e-mail
02/14/2018 | 08:48 am
Claudio Descalzi

Criminal case alleges corruption in Shell and Eni deal for Nigerian field

By Sarah Kent in Abuja, Nigeria, and Eric Sylvers in Milan

This article is being republished as part of our daily reproduction of articles that also appeared in the U.S. print edition of The Wall Street Journal (February 14, 2018).

A top oil executive walked into the marble lobby of an exclusive Milan hotel on a chilly winter night. His dinner date was a former Nigerian oil minister offering to sell one of Africa's biggest untapped oil discoveries.

Eight years later, the question of whether the $1.3 billion paid for the license to that prized oil field was mostly a bribe is at the heart of one of the biggest bribery scandals the oil industry has ever seen.

Part of a broader crackdown, the case has reached into the highest levels of the executive ranks of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, the second-largest Western oil company -- including wiretaps on its chief executive -- and into Eni SpA, Italy's state-backed oil company.

Italian prosecutors say Claudio Descalzi, the senior Eni executive at the Milan dinner, and high-level Shell officials approved an arrangement that allowed them to pay the government while knowing most of the money would be transferred to a company controlled by Dan Etete -- the ex-oil minister Mr. Descalzi met that night, according to court documents. The prosecutors say executives knew Mr. Etete would pay off Nigerian officials and send kickbacks to Eni executives. A criminal trial begins in Milan on March 5.

The scheme went as high as former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan, who received payouts during his presidency, the prosecutors say. Mr. Jonathan has denied involvement.

The case is a rare example of top executives from giant Western oil companies facing accountability for corruption. Scrutiny of foreign bribery is growing. More than 500 ongoing investigations were taking place in member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2016, up about 25% from 2015, according to the 35-nation group's latest analysis.

British authorities are investigating alleged oil-industry bribes in Iraq, and the U.S. has sought to recover more than $100 million as part of a wide-ranging investigation into oil-industry corruption in Nigeria.

The amount of money that allegedly changed hands in the Eni-Shell case could prove to be one of the oil industry's largest ever bribes, said Global Witness, a London nonprofit that investigates allegations of wrongdoing in the resources industry.

Mr. Descalzi, now Eni's chief executive, will face criminal charges of international corruption and bribery in the Milan trial, along with the company's CEO at the time of the Nigerian deal, Paolo Scaroni. Shell executives, including Malcolm Brinded, Shell's global exploration and production chief at the time of the deal, will also be tried on those charges, as well as both companies.

Eni and Shell both deny wrongdoing, saying they simply paid the government and didn't know the money would be used for bribes.

"Eni and Shell paid the consideration for this license to the Nigerian government," Eni wrote in emailed responses to questions from The Wall Street Journal. "It was the prerogative, right and at the discretion of the Nigerian government to to use the price received from Eni and Shell."

"The board has said clearly that it has full confidence in the company and in Claudio Descalzi," Eni Chairwoman Emma Marcegaglia said in an interview.

A Shell spokesman said the company didn't believe there was a basis to prosecute Shell. "If the evidence ultimately proves that improper payments were is Shell's position that none of those payments were made with its knowledge, authorization or on its behalf," he said.

Eni's Mr. Descalzi, who was appointed by the Italian government for a second three-year term as CEO in April, Mr. Scaroni, who left Eni in 2014, and Shell's Mr. Brinded, who left the company in 2012, denied wrongdoing.

Shell and Eni also face prosecution in Nigeria, one of Africa's biggest oil producers. The country's financial crimes watchdog has threatened to strip the companies of their claim to the oil field.

Shell and Eni in 2011 jointly acquired the license to the area known as OPL 245 in the waters off Nigeria's coast, but so far development has been stalled amid the investigations.

This account of the deal is based on interviews with more than a dozen people with knowledge of the case, internal company emails and documents, and hundreds of pages of court documents from cases in Britain, Italy and Nigeria reviewed by the Journal.

The deal pulled in top executives for Shell and Eni, who were required to approve and in some cases negotiate the transaction, bringing them into contact with a host of now discredited figures in Nigeria.

Chief among them is Mr. Etete, a Nigerian politician who was an oil minister in the mid-1990s during the reign of military dictator Sani Abacha, and who personally claimed ownership of OPL 245. Mr. Etete's career has been dogged by corruption allegations. In 2007 he was convicted of money laundering in France and was pardoned in 2014. A lawyer for Mr. Etete, whose whereabouts is unknown, didn't respond to requests for comment. He faces corruption charges in both Milan and Nigeria.

"It smacks of a Hollywood movie," said Razak Atunwa, a Nigerian member of parliament investigating the case for the government. "You've got nefarious characters mixing with ministers, nefarious characters mixing with the presidency."

The struggle over OPL 245 dates back to 1998, when the Abacha government awarded the oil rights to a newly minted Nigerian firm called Malabu Oil and Gas. According to court documents, the company was ultimately owned by figures close to Mr. Abacha's regime, including his son and Mr. Etete, then the country's oil minister.

The company was meant to pay the government $20 million for the license, but paid only a little over $2 million, according to the court documents.

In 2001, Shell agreed to acquire a 40% interest from Malabu in the oil field. Shell, already a dominant producer in Nigeria, hoped the move would expand its footprint in the oil-rich waters off the coast. But within months, Malabu's ownership was revoked by the new, democratically elected president, Olusegun Obasanjo.

Shell won a new tender in 2002 that gave it exclusive rights to operate the field as a contractor for the state oil company, pledging to pay the government $210 million. But Mr. Etete, who was no longer in office, and later Mr. Abacha's son separately maintained their claims to the site. Successive Nigerian governments flip-flopped on the decision to rescind Malabu's license, helping tie up the ownership question in court.

In an attempt to resolve the dispute, Shell executives spent years alternately wooing Mr. Etete and threatening him with legal action. They negotiated over lunches accompanied by Champagne and discussed taking him on a stag hunting trip to Scotland, according to internal company emails reviewed by the Journal.

In the emails -- some with the subject line "Loony Tunes" -- Shell executives openly speculated that any settlement they reached with Mr. Etete would be used to pay off his political sponsors and fretted over the risk he might seek to strike a deal with another company.

In early 2009, John Copleston, a former British intelligence officer working for Shell in Nigeria, sent an email to colleagues that reported Mr. Etete was claiming he would keep $40 million of the $300 million Shell was offering at the time. "Rest goes in paying people off," Mr. Copleston wrote. Mr. Copleston couldn't be reached for comment.

Eni became involved in 2010. After discussions with Mr. Etete, the Italian firm, which already had major oil holdings in Nigeria, proposed to buy out Malabu's disputed stake. The company aimed to end Malabu's legal claims and join Shell in a 50-50 partnership to develop the offshore field.

Shell executives were pleased. According to internal emails, they were impressed by Mr. Descalzi's personal, "privileged" relationship with Mr. Jonathan, who was serving as acting president and would soon fully succeed the Nigerian president at the time. According to the emails, the two men met in southern Nigeria in the 1990s and had stayed close.

"Let's hope Eni can succeed where we have struggled to close on this," Shell's then-chief financial officer, Simon Henry, wrote in an email in October 2010.

Beginning that year, Mr. Descalzi for a period met twice a month with a middleman who claimed to be working on behalf of Mr. Etete, sometimes at a luxury hotel in London's Belgravia neighborhood, according to court documents. The Eni executive, a 36-year veteran and longtime Africa hand who led Eni's operations in Congo and in Nigeria, also oversaw months of talks with the Nigerian government and with Shell, according to internal Shell emails.

Meanwhile, two external risk reports commissioned by Eni in 2007 and 2010 had raised red flags about Mr. Etete. The documents, reviewed by the Journal, warned of past corruption allegations against the former oil minister and questioned aspects of his ownership of the oil license.

Pressure was mounting to settle the deal. Shell feared other companies such as Total SA of France and China's Cnooc were also negotiating with Mr. Etete. Cnooc didn't respond to requests for comment. Total declined to comment.

"We need to move fast as the wolves are indeed circling," wrote Mr. Brinded, the global exploration and production chief, in an October 2010 email to colleagues.

Eni and Shell soon hammered out a complicated deal with the Nigerian government, according to emails and court documents. In a deal that included Shell's previous promise to pay around $210 million, the company agreed to pay a total of just under $320 million for a 50% stake. Eni would pay a little more than $980 million for the other 50%.

(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires

02-14-18 0247ET

Envoyer par e-mail